| |
|
Section H: ADDENDUM NOTATIONS
|
|
| Addendum #1 - History of the Ekahi Apartment Alteration Manual development
In early 2000, the Ekahi Board of Directors Directed that a comprehensive Apartment Alterations Manual be developed. A Procedures and Standards of Apartment Alterations document existed at the time. However, it did not always provide specific enough guidance regarding many alteration requests. The need for a more complete and comprehensive manual became further evident because of the following
- An expressed desire on the part of the Board to insure that Ekahi Property values and aesthetics are maintained and enhanced over the long term.
- Over the years, some of the rules regarding permitted alterations to condominium units had changed almost as frequently as Boards and their committees had changed. Thus; Owners, new Boards, and Committees, were often confused regarding permitted and non-permitted changes.
- Legal cases, based on Hawaii condominium laws, generally support owners requested changes, if other owners in the same community had been granted the right to make similar changes in the past, regardless of reasons or location considerations. That is, if a change was allowed in one unit, perhaps because it could not be seen due to location, it could not generally be denied in another location where it might be seen and found objectionable. In most instances, everyone in the community must be treated the same and according to the same set of rules. Thus, a set of common standards needed to exist.
Based on the above, the Ekahi Board was advised by its attorney that it should develop a comprehensive Alterations Manual to be ultimately adopted as its policy from that date forward subject only to clarification and updating as required by new requests for which standards did not exist, new technologies became available, and new considerations were presented.
The Board interviewed several registered architects who had extensive experience in Hawaii and Resort architecture. They ultimately contracted with one highly qualified semi-retired architect, Frank Steena, (now deceased) to work with a select committee composed of 2 Board members and the Building & Site committee to prepare an Apartment Alterations Manual for Board consideration.
Guidance given to the select committee by the Ekahi Board and its Attorney was to: 1. Review any prior Ekahi alterations guidelines. 2. Review all prior approved alterations in Ekahi unit files. 3. Review, on site, many previously approved apartment alterations. 4. Review existing Hawaii Condominium Laws. 5. Review all Ekahi Governing documents. 6. Always strive to preserve the unique design character of the original exterior appearance of the Ekahi Buildings - This particular guidance was deemed critical because owners who purchase within a condominium community have a legal right of expectation regarding a long term continuation of the appearance of the community. 7. Grant owners as much flexibility as possible regarding interior alterations. 8. Always consider the impact of any alterations on immediate neighbors and the community as a whole - Owners of nearby units have a right to not have their rights "of quiet enjoyment and private personal use" violated by the actions of others within the community. 9. Routinely refer developing regulations to the Ekahi Attorney and Architect for their professional suggestions and approval. 10. Keep the Board constantly updated with draft documentation.
During the final presentation to the Board, for approval, the architect stated these primary concerns for future guidance to the community:
- Jalousie windows must be retained as they are an integral design component. In addition, they provide important cross ventilation to cool units without using expensive to run and noise producing Air Conditioning systems.
- Living room and same facing bedroom lanais are not to be built-out (enclosed). If done, a slab-walled "Box Store" appearance will develop - destroying the architectural integrity of the community.
- No build-outs that extend beneath shed roof overhangs (especially in 1 bedroom, 1 bath units) are to be allowed - destroying the architectural integrity of the community.
- If upstairs unit owners wish to extend hard surface flooring beyond original locations, the burden of proof must be on them (or their contractor) to prove, prior to installation, that there will be no increase in noise to the unit below. Otherwise, the requests are to be denied.
- Whenever requested and Board approved alterations involve changes to building structural components such as load bearing entities or sheer walls, plumbing or electrical runs within common elements, or any other building common elements; Maui County Building Permits and Signed Engineering or Architectural drawings are to be required.
After approximately one year of reviews, committee meetings and draft preparation; including multiple reviews with the Ekahi Board of Directors along the way, the select committee's Apartment Alterations Manual was adopted in early 2001. It has since been updated to reflect new requirements and for purposes of clarification.
The Building & Site committee, in association with the Ekahi General Manager, is responsible for keeping the Apartment Alteration Manual current, both in printed and Ekahi website form. No changes are to be made to the manual without prior Board approval.
|
| return to TOP
|
| Addendum #2 - DAMAGED LANAIS - By Resolution of the Board, 11/12/2008:
Owners are responsible for taking care of their lanais. If lanais are being cracked or broken by nearby common area plant roots, the Association will, on a case-by-case basis, work with the owner to remove plant roots that are causing the problem if the owner decides to replace their lanai. In addition, the Association will, on a case-by-case basis, consider removing lanai threatening plants based on the impact on neighbors and other owners. However, the Association's preference is to not remove plants that are desired and found attractive by neighbors and other owners.
|
| return to TOP
|
Addendum #3 - The Future of Covenant Enforcement Actions
Hawaii Condo Bulletin (Oahu) - Feb 2009 - Council Opinion
A. Hard Surface Floors: Many boards of directors of condominium associations have paid little attention in the past to replacement of carpeting with hard surface floors. However, hard surface floors have become much more popular and easily accessible to owners to install The problem is that many build¬ings were not designed to allow hard surface flooring in any areas except perhaps a small entry way or the bathroom. As a consequence, condominium boards are receiving complaints about the noise transmission to lower or adjacent units. While some boards would understandably prefer not to become involved in these issues, unfortunately, the statutes demand that the boards review and approve all work done by owners including replacement of carpeting with hard surface floors:
"No unit owner shall do any work that may jeopardize the soundness or safety of the property, reduce the value thereof, or impair any easement, as reasonably determined by the board."
HRS Section 514B-140: Moreover, if the hard surface flooring could interfere with the right of other unit owners to use and enjoy their units, the alteration very likely would be defined as "material" by a court and require the approval of other owners -67% of the common interest and directly affected owners (ie., the owner below):
"Subject to the provisions of the declaration, no unit owner may make or allow any material addition or alteration, or excavate an additional basement or cellar, without first ob¬taining the written consent of sixty-seven per cent of the unit owners, the consent of all unit owners whose units or appur¬tenant limited common elements are directly affected, and the approval of the board, which shall not unreasonably with¬hold such approval The declaration may limit the board's ability to approve or condition a proposed addition or alter¬ation; provided that the board shall always have the fight to disapprove a proposed addition or alteration that the board reasonably determines could jeopardize the soundness or safety of the property, impair any easement, or interfere with or deprive any nonconsenting owner of the use or enjoyment of any part of the property."
HRS Section 514B-140: If a hard surface floor interferes with the right of other occupants to use and enjoy their apartment, the hard surface floor is "material" under the statute. Thus, faced with this type of proposal the Board must adopt standards of installation designed by professionals (e.g., acoustical engineers) to avoid any interference with the other owners (and thus the alteration becomes non-material). The Board can also submit the proposal to a vote and obtain the approval of 67% of the common interest plus nil directly affected owners (based on an. amendment to the declaration to allow installation of the hard surface flooring based on the standards recognized by the professionals).
A number of courts from other jurisdictions have concluded that hard surface flooring creates a nuisance. And, as noted above, some experts advise that there are some buildings that were not designed for the flooring and that only carpeting as installed by the original developer will suffice to prevent interference with the right of the owner below to enjoy his or her unit.
|
|